• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Barry S. Edwards

Minnesota Criminal Defense Attorney

  • Criminal Defense
  • Success Stories
  • About
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / Criminal Defense / Get Your DWI Advice from an Attorney, Not the Local Paper

Get Your DWI Advice from an Attorney, Not the Local Paper

Barry S. Edwards · Apr 14, 2010 · Leave a Comment

The most popular (e-mailed) article in today’s Minneapolis Star Tribune is yet another in a breathless series on Minnesota’s DWI laws.  Star Tribune reporter, Richard Meryhew writes, “In Minnesota, there are no additional criminal sanctions for driving drunk with a child in the car, though it can be used as a factor in sentencing.”

This is wrong.

A simple DWI (4th degree, blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08) becomes a 3rd degree DWI if a child under 16 is in the car.  This is the same crime as a second conviction within 10 years or driving with a BAC of 0.2 or higher.  4th degree DWI and 3rd degree DWI are different crimes, not the same crime with different factors to consider at sentencing.  While 4th degree DWI is a misdemeanor, 3rd degree is a gross misdemeanor.

I spoke with Mr. Meryhew and his editor, Jeffrey Meitrodt, both of whom defended the sentence I quoted above.  Mr. Meitrodt went so far as to say that he would trust his team of reporters who write on Minnesota statutes regularly over what I thought, no matter how much experience I had as a criminal defense attorney, or whom I had talked to.

I contacted an Assistant Hennepin County Attorney in the Criminal Division (i.e., a prosecutor) who stated, unambiguously, that 3rd degree DWI and 4th degree are different crimes.  I followed up with a sitting Hennepin County District Court judge, who commented, upon reading that sentence in the paper, the immediate impression was that it was indeed incorrect.  When I asked the judge if these were different crimes, one for a BAC of 0.08 and no child in the car and one with a BAC of 0.08 with a child in the car, the judge replied “there is no dispute about that.”

As the most e-mailed column in today’s Star Tribune, I’m afraid Mr. Meryhew’s incorrect statement of the law will get a wider viewing than my blog.  However, be forewarned: do not go in front of a Minnesota judge having been charged of driving drunk with a child in the car and expect that your charge is the same as “simple” DWI but with different factors to consider at sentencing.  And don’t hire a reporter as an attorney.

Criminal Defense DUI, DWI, Legal Representation

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

About Barry S. Edwards

Barry S. Edwards is a criminal defense attorney. He provides personalized attentive legal solutions and representation for individuals in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and surrounding Minnesota communities. Read More…

Contact me now

SuperLawyer

NCDD

Sober enough to drive? Find out.

Virtual Bar: We've got your BAC

Recent Posts

  • Recreating Police
  • Presumption of . . . Guilt!
  • What’s the Law: COVID-19 Edition
  • COVID-19 Forces Bail Reform
  • Not Guilty

Affiliations, memberships, admissions

  • Minnesota State Bar Association
  • Minnesota State Bar Association Criminal Law Section---Executive Committee
  • Hennepin County Bar Association
  • Minnesota Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
  • MSCJ (Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice) Source Code Coalition
  • National College for DUI Defense
  • Volunteer Lawyers Network
  • Eyewitness ID Jury Instruction and Litigation Strategy Group
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Barry S. Edwards Law Office, LLC
333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 405, Minneapolis MN 55401
Phone: (612) 310-7398

CALL NOW: (612) 310-7398

333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 405, Minneapolis MN 55401

Copyright © 2025 · Monochrome Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in